Resume Studio
Tailor the story. Keep the facts intact.
A local resume prototype that connects job requirements to source evidence, prompts for factual additions, and requires review before an editable Word export.
THE DESIGN QUESTION
How can a resume become more relevant to a role while keeping every claim traceable to the applicant?
Separate analysis, factual supplementation, and approval. Preserve source wording and make additions visible, so the candidate remains responsible for the final story.
- My contribution
- The evidence-review flow, factual confirmation steps, and document-preservation checks in a local prototype.
- Current scope
- Local alpha · rule-based analysis
- Exploring
- Evidence mapping · Human-in-the-loop · Validation
THE WORKFLOW
Import
Upload or paste a resume and review the extracted text.
Compare
Review source-backed strengths and gaps against a job description.
Confirm
Add factual wording and choose where it belongs.
Export
Approve the complete draft, then download Word.
A CLOSER LOOK
An addition should have a source and a destination.
Fictional teaching example · not a real applicant’s information
The job asks for cross-functional collaboration.
The tool searches the submitted material for relevant evidence before suggesting an addition.
Source: “Worked with engineers on a prototype.”
Keep the source wording visible; a weak match does not justify inventing leadership or an outcome.
Candidate adds: “Reviewed the prototype weekly with two engineers.”
The candidate confirms accuracy and selects the experience section where this fact belongs.
Review the complete draft before export.
Highlight the added line and confirm that the original source content is still present.
Text-preservation checks operate after import. They do not guarantee correct extraction from scanned PDFs or complex layouts, and the browser does not reproduce Word pagination.
UNDER THE SURFACE
Make the process legible.
Make the boundaries explicit.
Workflow
Local keyword and template analysis links requirements to evidence and supplies structured prompts for missing information.
Human control
New facts require confirmation and an explicit destination; the complete draft has a separate approval step.
Validation
Source-line preservation is checked against document blocks, including repeated occurrences; missing content blocks approval and export.
TODAY
Local prototype
Import, source review, factual additions, full-draft approval, and Word export work in the local alpha.
WHAT’S NEXT
Still exploring
Refine the interface and evaluate any future writing-model integration against the existing evidence and approval controls.
The current implementation uses local rules and templates. Its named analysis stages are not independent AI agents, and no external writing model is called.